Do you remember when it was learned a few months ago that Pfizer’s animal trials involved giving COVID vaccines to 44 French rats? But then they killed all the rats and declared their vaccine was safe and effective for pregnant and nursing human mothers, because nothing bad had happened to the rats (which they killed before studying the vaccine’s effects). As bad as Pfizer’s vaccine testing was, Moderna’s rat trials were even worse. Check this out.
Government watchdog group, Judicial Watch, finally received about 700 pages of Moderna documents through a Freedom of Information Act request to the government. While Moderna’s internal documents are still being kept secret, they had to file a Biological Licensing Application with the FDA. That document, Judicial Watch correctly argued, is a public record. We still haven’t seen any of Moderna’s internal vaccine documentation yet, as we have with Pfizer, but this is a significant first step.
Among the documents are the reproductive toxicology tests that Moderna conducted on a group of female rats. The rats were injected with the Moderna vaccine and then impregnated. Unlike Pfizer, Moderna didn’t immediately kill all of its rats. To Moderna’s credit, they saw the experiment through; they aborted some of the baby rats to see if their shot affected fetal development and allowed others to give birth to their babies to see the results.
Here’s what the Moderna documentation says:
“mRNA-1273-related variations in skeletal examination included statistically significant increases in the number of F1 rats with 1 or more wavy ribs and 1 or more rib nodules. Wavy ribs appeared in 6 fetuses and 4 litters with a fetal prevalence of 4.03% and a litter prevalence of 18.2%. Rib nodules appeared in 5 of those 6 fetuses.”
Let’s define a couple of terms that get tossed around when it comes to vaccines or any other medications: “Rare” and “very rare.” A rare side effect is considered one that occurs in between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 10,000 patients. A very rare side effect is considered one that occurs even less often than 1 in 10,000.
If 4% of the baby rats born to vaccinated mothers had rib malformities and rib nodules, that’s a rate of 1 in 20. That’s not very rare. That’s not rare. That’s dangerously common.
The documentation doesn’t say whether the “nodules” on the babies’ ribs were fibrous dysplasia, enchondroma or osteochondroma (three types of benign rib cancers) or if the nodules were simple fatty tissue lumps. That would be nice to know, but either way, it’s not normal in babies.
The FDA approval label for Moderna’s Spikevax, which is the vaccine in question, states:
“No vaccine-related fetal malformations or variations and no adverse effect on postnatal development were observed in the study.”
That is a flat-out lie from the Food and Drug Administration. And it’s not the first time, obviously.
Let’s not forget that Pfizer’s documents showed that 44% of pregnant women in their trials LOST THEIR BABIES. Out of 50 pregnant women that they gave the vaccine to, 22 of them had miscarriages and their babies died.
Dr. Naomi Wolf described the tragedy like this:
“Pfizer took those deaths of babies—those spontaneous abortions and miscarriages—and recategorized them as recovered/resolved adverse effects. In other words, if you lost your baby, it was categorized by Pfizer as resolved adverse event, like a headache that got better.”
The FDA received that documentation from Pfizer in April of 2021 – a year and a half ago! And yet both the FDA and the CDC remain adamant to this day that all pregnant and expecting and breastfeeding mothers should get the vaccine. It appears that the FDA and the CDC are just as corrupt as the FBI, and that’s saying a lot these days! And these ghouls described a miscarried baby as a “resolved adverse event?” That is disgusting.
Pfizer and Moderna’s own documents state that these vaccines can cause catastrophic miscarriage rates and can cause malformations and some type of lump – maybe cancerous, maybe not – in unborn babies. Does that sound like a “safe and effective” medicine that women of childbearing age should be getting injected with?