No one can continue to claim that the so-called COVID “vaccines” do not cause permanent eye damage. They can’t claim that it’s a “conspiracy theory” or that it’s purely anecdotal if someone gets a COVID jab and starts losing their vision in one or both eyes. Not after this. Researchers have proven that the mRNA technology in the shots kills nonreplaceable endothelium cells in the eye for at least the first 2.5 months post-vaccination. Permanent eye damage happens even in young people with perfect vision before they take the jabs.
Researchers from two university hospitals in Turkey have published the results of a peer-reviewed study in the prestigious journal of Ophthalmic Epidemiology. They performed a prospective study, which is the type of “good science” that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is always talking about. This is the type of study that should have been done before the COVID mRNA was mass-injected into the human population.
A prospective medical study is one that’s conducted in a healthy group of volunteers. Doctors thoroughly examine them beforehand to establish benchmarks. Next, you administer an experimental medicine or drug to them. Finally, you track the results to view the impacts of the experimental medicine (in this case, the COVID jabs) to see if there are any changes or negative effects that result from it.
For this study, the doctors selected 64 volunteers (128 eyeballs total). They were all relatively young and healthy (20s and 30s). None of them had ever tested positive for COVID-19, so they didn’t have any spike proteins floating around in their systems to skew the results. None of them had ever received a COVID jab before.
The doctors scanned the volunteers’ eyes using Sirius corneal topography and Tomey EM-4000 specular microscopy. These are advanced imaging tools that can make a closeup infrared-type scan of an eyeball. If you’ve been to an eye doctor anywhere in the US in the past few years, you’ve probably received one of these scans.
That gave the doctors a baseline for each individual volunteer. Next, they gave the volunteers the Pfizer (BNT162b2) mRNA jab for COVID-19. They waited 75 days post-vaccination, or about two and a half months, and scanned everyone’s eyeballs again.
The results were universal.
Every volunteer lost around 8.4% of their endothelial cell density. They went from 2,597 cells/mm2 to around 2,378 cells/mm2.
Endothelial cells are nonreplaceable. Once they die or degrade, you’ve lost them permanently. Losing these cells alters the shape and structure of the eyeball. People can go from perfect vision to blurry vision or worse when they lose a bunch of endothelial cells all at once.
As a simplified example, if a person has 20/40 vision in one eye and 20/60 in the other, it means that the 20/60 eyeball has lost more endothelial cells, and that eyeball is a different shape than the other one.
With so many endothelial cells degrading in the eyeballs of the volunteers, something has to fill in the vacuum created by their loss. In the volunteers, their neighboring endothelial cells experienced stretching to fill part of the void. Their surviving endothelial cells experienced a 2% reduction in hexagonality.
Corneal thickness also increased in each of the volunteers’ eyeballs. This suggests a fluid imbalance and corneal edema to try to fill the empty space left by the endothelial cells that were disintegrated by the mRNA shots.
This is the first prospective study that proves all the people on social media who claimed that their vision got blurry or they went blind after the COVID jabs were not crazy or exaggerating. They were telling the truth.
If any COVIDian safe-and-effective cultists want to look at this study and try their usual, “Duhhhh! Durrr! Duhhh! Debunked conspiracy theory!” arguments, those no longer cut it. Replicate this study and prove the doctors wrong. Do some real science for once.
This study shows that jab recipients all experienced permanent eye damage. Does anyone still believe that these jabs were “safe and effective?”
You can view the abstract for this study HERE, although the full results are behind a paywall.