These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content test

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More


Whistleblower Reveals DAMMING New Details Which Makes It Seem Like the Secret Service WANTED to Get Trump Killed

A whistleblower has revealed that the Secret Service REJECTED an offer from local police to fly drones at President Donald Trump’s rally where he was nearly killed–WHY would they do that?

Senator Josh Hawley said that the whistleblower came forward to expose what could be yet another [perhaps] intentional failure by the Secret Service to allow the attempted Trump assassination to occur.

Hawley wrote in a letter to disgraced Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas that “According to one whistleblower, the night before the rally, US Secret Service repeatedly denied offers from a local law enforcement partner to utilize drone technology to secure the rally.”

This means that the technology was both available to USSS and able to be deployed to secure the sight,” he continued, adding that the Secret Service bizarrely refused.

 

Even more outrageous is this fact, “The whistleblower further alleges that AFTER the shooting took place, USSS changed course and asked the local partner to deploy the drone technology to surveil the site in the aftermath of the attack,” wrote Senator Hawley.

Notably, it is standard practice for Secret Service to fly drones over such an event to get an aerial view of the grounds and ensure that nobody can… I don’t know, climb up on a rooftop with a rifle 150 yards away from the former (and future) president of the United States.

Not only did USSS refuse drone coverage for that day, they ALSO conveniently did not restrict the airspace over Trump as is also standard practice, allowing Thomas Matthew Crooks to fly his drone near the rally site just a few hours before Trump got up on stage.

Hawley questioned the Secret Service’s motivation behind this.

It is hard to understand why USSS would decline to use drones when they were offered, particularly given the fact USSS permitted the shooter to overfly the rally area with his own drone mere hours before the event. The failure to deploy drone technology is all the more concerning since, according to the whistleblower, the drones USSS was offered had the capability not only to identify active shooters but also to help neutralize them.”

This refusal of drone coverage is much more than just some security failure. The Secret Service was seemingly determined to ensure that there was NOT drones overhead because they would have EASILY spotted Thomas Matthew Crooks before he ever got a chance to fire off any rounds.

Even with all of the other security failures, the drones alone would have thwarted the assassination attempt.

It’s now more clear than ever that the USSS did everything in their power to pave the way for the July 13 attempt on Trump’s life and frankly, we should have seen it coming.

The Democrats have corrupted EVERY SINGLE federal agency, using them to do their bidding against their political adversaries – it was naive to assume that the Secret Service would be any different.

The DOJ’s lawfare tactics were not enough, so assassination was their last resort and it’s obvious, they shot their shot.


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More