These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content test

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More


Princeton & MIT Scientists: CO2 is Good for the World and Cannot Cause Global Warming

Two of the leading radiation physicists in the world have published an amazing treatise on the concept of global warming. These scientists are trying to sound the alarm on the so-called Net Zero movement, which promises to save the planet from the weather if only we sacrifice the one thing that makes modern life so enjoyable, easy, and survivable: cheap and accessible energy.

If the entire world achieved the Net Zero goals by the year 2050, the scientists assert that it would have a trivial impact on global temperatures—but a horrifying impact on human beings.

Richard Lindzen is the Professor of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). William Happer is the Professor of Physics, Emeritus at Princeton University. These men are two of the smartest scientists in the world today. They have specialized expertise in radiation physics, which studies how carbon dioxide (CO2) affects the flow of heat in Earth’s atmosphere.

Unlike the guessing game of climatology, these guys get measurable and repeatable results in their studies that involve non-subjective math. They can prove everything that they say, whereas climatologists have accuracy that is more akin to visiting a witch doctor to have that lump in your armpit diagnosed.

Based on their years of research, Drs. Lindzen and Happer have come to four major conclusions that they want the world to know about.

 

First, CO2 is an extremely weak greenhouse gas. It is not the “main driver” of global warming. That’s scientifically false.

We have enough CO2 in our atmosphere right now that it’s lost its ability to trap any more heat on earth—much like the way that you can’t keep your house warmer if you put more insulation on top of the insulation that’s already in your attic.

If the United States were to achieve Net Zero by 2050 by completely banning all fossil fuels and killing every cow so that it can’t fart anymore, it would prevent a global temperature increase between 0.02- and 0.06-degrees Fahrenheit.

If the entire world achieved Net Zero by 2050, it would prevent a temperature increase between 0.13- and 0.50-degrees Fahrenheit.

Second, Net Zero policies would have catastrophic effects on everyone worldwide. We won’t lose just combustion engines and steak if we get to Net Zero (all those poor dead cows!). We’ll also lose refrigeration, modern hospital care, heat in the wintertime, A/C in the summer, and a lot more.

The fertilizer used to grow most of the food in the world would also be banned under Net Zero. Starvation and famine would be a result, and the most vocal proponents of Net Zero will even tell you that’s a feature and not a bug of the plan.

Third, more CO2 means more food in the world. CO2 is plant food. Carbon is, after all, the “molecule of life.” If we were to double the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere right now, to 800 parts per million, it would have a trivial impact on global temperatures. However, we would be able to grow 60% more food worldwide. That’s not speculation.

That’s MATH!

Fourth, the use of fossil fuels must not be banned. The burning of fossil fuels supposedly contributes about 90% of the human-induced CO2 in the atmosphere. The math shows that eliminating fossil fuels will have almost no impact on climate whatsoever.

The conclusion that Lindzen and Happer come to is this:

“The use of fossil fuels must not be eliminated and should be expanded because they (1) provide more carbon dioxide which makes more food, (2) are used to make nitrogen fertilizer that enables the feeding of about half of the world’s population, and (3) provide reliable and inexpensive energy for people everywhere, especially for the two-thirds of the world’s population without adequate access to electricity.”

If you have kids in a public school today, they are never going to be exposed to this information. They’re being brainwashed by a non-scientific religious cult that is so effective that even a smart guy like Elon Musk can be duped into believing it’s real.

Global warming is not real. Climate change is not real. The goals of Net Zero will be catastrophic to humanity. Cow farts and fertilizer are not dangerous substances.

You can show your kids the real science from Drs. Lindzen and Happer HERE.


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More