BIG: Federal Court Revives Landmark Case Against Vaccine Mandates

Healthcare cure concept with a hand in blue medical gloves holding Coronavirus, Covid 19 virus, vaccine vial

The Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF) sued the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) in 2021 over its COVID “vaccine” mandate. A District Court judge ruled on the side of tyranny and threw the case out in 2022.

However, HFDF just won a major victory in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The appellate judges ruled that the District Court got it wrong, and the case has now been revived.

This has the potential to be a landmark ruling that could prevent the government from mandating any future mRNA gene therapies.

 

When HFDF challenged the mandate on behalf of Los Angeles teachers, they argued that it violated their rights to due process and equal protection. They argued that the COVID jabs don’t guard against infection, so the mandates were therefore unconstitutional.

District Judge Dale Fischer shot that argument down, using the same argument that Alan Dershowitz used in favor of vax mandates back in 2021. That argument was that in 1905, the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of a smallpox vaccine mandate in Jacobson v. Massachusetts.

Judge Fischer ruled against the plaintiffs because she argued that the vaccines reduce symptoms and prevent death (LOL!).

A panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals took a flamethrower to Fischer’s ruling. One of the most significant aspects of why the judges overturned Fischer is because the COVID shots are not “vaccines.”

The CDC changed the historical and scientific definition of the word “vaccine” so that it would apply to the COVID shots. A huge difference between the 1905 case and COVID shots, according to the Ninth Circuit, is that the smallpox vaccine prevents people from catching and spreading smallpox. Therefore, the government had a compelling public health interest in ruling in favor of the Massachusetts smallpox vaccine mandate.

None of that applies to the COVID shots. They don’t prevent you from catching COVID. They don’t prevent you from spreading COVID. They don’t prevent you from dying from COVID. At best, they might mitigate the symptoms of COVID in some people, although there is little evidence that this is true.

When the Court of Appeals asked the defense lawyers for the school district to provide evidence that the COVID shots prevent serious illness, they were unable to point to a single scientific study to prove their case. Not one!

Here we are three years after Joe Biden and the rest of the COVID tyrants tried to force everyone to take the shots, and there is still no scientific proof that they’ll even prevent you from getting sick from COVID. The defense lawyers argued that the CDC still says the shots are “safe and effective.”

“Safe and effective for what?” the court asked rhetorically.

Because the COVID shots don’t prevent transmission of the coronavirus, the court ruled that Judge Fischer had misapplied the standard that the Supreme Court set in Jacobson. Furthermore, because the shots are not vaccines, they are therefore medical treatments.

The courts have consistently ruled that forced medical treatments are a form of battery and a violation of individual rights. The country has a long legal tradition of allowing individuals to reject medical treatments that they don’t want. Even recent Supreme Court precedent states that “a competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment.”

In its ruling, the Ninth Circuit panel stated:

“The right to refuse unwanted medical treatment is entirely consistent with this Nation’s history and constitutional traditions and the case merits are sufficient to invoke that fundamental right.”

Judge Fischer will now have to rehear the Health Defense Freedom Fund’s case against the LAUSD. This time around, however, he won’t be able to rely on the one Supreme Court precedent that authorizes vaccine mandates. In all likelihood, the LAUSD is going to lose this case and it will set a federal precedent against all COVID vaccine mandates, not just the LAUSD.

The implications of this are massive. The shots are not “vaccines,” so Pfizer and Moderna could potentially lose their liability shield under the CARES Act. Massive class action lawsuits against Big Pharma could result. It will also provide protection for all Americans the next time they try to force everyone to take an experimental medicine against their will.


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More

5 thoughts on “BIG: Federal Court Revives Landmark Case Against Vaccine Mandates”

  1. You will never do anything to me. Jabs nope, take our guns, rockets, missiles nope!!! Our government is inept

    1. No not inept !! This government we have now is totally corrupt and it seems we can’t get them out fast enough before they totally destroy our country.

    2. We don’t need China killing more citizens in the United States. Biden probably relieved a nice check from China for the baby parts.
      God Bless America
      I won’t take the vaccines either. Give them to Fuckerburg and Gates.

  2. This is excellent! The government would eventually try to mandate jabs for bird flu or the next Plandemic,so this would put a stop to that! It also helps stop the government from putting us into the world health organization initiative! They say that after C19 we should work on a global outlook helping each other but they could control our lives with anything they want to mandate. Overall, no one should be able to take away our choice of what goes into our bodies. I’m pretty sure that “the jab” is the mark of the beast,it limits what we can/can’t do along with the evil side effects that have occurred to many.

  3. One thing I have said all along is that different medications have different, reactions for different people – some of those reactions can even be fatal. You cannot force over 300,000,000 in this country alone – 8 billion worldwide to take the same medication and not expect to have a lot of very bad results. There are people who will have very serious issues from just pure water. We saw all the heart attacks in young people after being vaxxed – something never seen before – that cannot be waived off in favor of politics. Those side effects don’t care at all who you vote for.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *