These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content test

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More


Former Director Cheatle’s Testimony Makes Lurid Suggestion about the Numbers of Shooters Involved in the Attempt on Trump’s Life

Kimberly Cheatle, resigned as Secret Service Director yesterday morning, but before she did she confessed to members of Congress that there may have been MULTIPLE SHOOTERS trying to take out former President Donald Trump in Butler, PA. But not just that, they may have been FBI!

Cheatle was ordered to testify before Congress about the colossal failure that made it possible for Donald Trump to nearly be killed and she did SO BAD that she RESIGNED from her post within 24 hours.

At the hearing Director Cheatle refused to answer most of the questions Congress lobbed her way. One of the few questions she did offer new information on came when Republican Rep. Andy Biggs asked her to verify whether or not Thomas Matthew Crooks – the shooter they’ve told us about – was acting alone.

It is unfathomable that a 20-year-old on the radar of Secret Service and local law enforcement before President Trump went on stage was able to climb on the roof of a building with a rifle and fire off multiple rounds before he was neutralized,” Biggs said.

Was Mr. Crooks acting alone?” he asked.

 

Cheatle, refused to confirm that he was acting alone as we’re being told, instead telling Biggs to ask the FBI.

Was he just a lone gunman?” the congressman asked again for clarity.

I would have to refer you to the FBI’s investigation for motive,” Cheatle responded again, maintaining a refusal to verify the accuracy of the narrative that Crooks acted alone.

 

On its own, this may have seemed like mere legal-speak out of the director, but paired with some of her other comments, it all becomes a bit more obvious that there was probably more people involved in this assassination attempt on former President Trump.

The former director also confirmed that there was only ONE counter sniper team that took ONE shot.

And then, Cheatle admitted that she knew the number of shell casings found on the rooftop alongside Crooks – but she REFUSED to make this info public.

Why? Because some simple math would give us COLD HARD EVIDENCE that Crooks was not the only shooter aiming for Trump.

Even without knowing the number of shell casings, with Cheatle saying that only one counter sniper team engaged she is admitting that the other shots which can be heard in the very well might have come from a secondary shooter.

And when you start to ask WHO that second shooter was? Things get REALLY interesting.

The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project released mobile-geolocation data to suggest that someone who regularly visited Thomas Matthew Crooks’ home and work ALSO happened to frequently visit a building in the vicinity of the Washington, D.C. FBI office.

We found the assassin’s connections through our in-depth analysis of mobile ad data to track movements of Crooks and his associates,” said the Oversight Project. “To do this, we tracked devices that regularly visited both Crooks’ home and place of work and followed them.”

This means Crooks or whoever he was working with was very likely linked back to the Trump-hating FBI.

Things just keep getting crazier…


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More