After Michigan’s 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A. Elsenheimer gave permission to release the forensic report of 16 Dominion voting machines in Antrim County, a bombshell report revealed an astonishing 68 percent error rate. Investigators claim the software system intentionally creates errors, allowing individuals to edit results.
Allied Security Operations Group, the firm that prepared the report, noted, “We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.” Despite Dominion’s public statements denying glitches or errors, the forensic report verified the software’s ability to be manipulated nationwide in the 2020 election.
Keep in mind, the Michigan audit took place following a Biden win of more than 2,500 votes in the small Republican county. Two days later, the county reported an alleged software glitch, flipping the original total of 9,783-7,289 for Joe Biden to 9,748-5,960 for President Trump.
The original report claimed the software problem was connected to a failure to make needed software updates. However, the Allied audit and other forensic experts have now shown evidence against this story.
Dominion immediately dismissed the audit. Instead, they played victim of an attacking Trump base, stating they are part of a “continuing malicious and widespread disinformation campaign.”
The Antrim County Dominion audit has widespread implications for the 2020 presidential election. The voting machines are used in 30 states, including Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, the key battleground areas under dispute following massive voting spikes toward Biden in the early morning following election night.
Phill Kline, director of the Amistad Project involved in many of the election legal cases across battleground states, noted in a news release, “The error rate detailed in this report has implications for every state where we have litigation, and it comes on a day when officials are blocking legislators from having their say about elections in their states.” Kline also added, “This joins with other compelling evidence that the elections in these states cannot be certified under the law.”
Yet Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson released a statement contradicting reality: “If the Trump campaign had any actual evidence of wrongdoing – or genuine suspicion thereof – they could have requested a hand recount of every ballot in the state…. They did not, instead choosing to allow shadowy organizations claiming expertise to throw around baseless claims of fraud in an effort to mislead American voters and undermine the integrity of the election.”
Contrary to her words, Trump’s legal team and others have already called for this exact request. A full statewide hand count is the only way to genuinely determine the winner of Michigan’s electoral votes—and the votes in other battleground states.
Despite Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s attempts to block access to Republican electoral college voters and dismiss any evidence of election fraud, the evidence clearly indicates the need to further investigate the state votes. Further, the report should cause a decertification of Michigan’s vote pending a hand recount of legal votes.
Regardless of the votes of the Electoral College on December 14, Trump legal experts continue to challenge the election results of multiple states involved in widespread fraud. Though mainstream media continues to argue such efforts are futile, the growing evidence shows the need for ongoing proceedings.