Legal scholars have dueling opinions on what the Brunson v. Alma Adams, et al case before the Supreme Court next month actually means. Some think it could overturn the 2020 election. Others think the high court will kick it to the curb or send it back to the lower courts. We won’t know until the date for Docket No. 22-380 arrives.
We do have a couple of updates that we want to share with everyone about the case, which we previously reported on HERE. No matter what anyone else says, some legal scholars believe this case does in fact have the potential to overturn the fake 2020 election, and boot Biden and Harris out of office along with 385 Members of Congress.
The case was originally filed in a Utah district court by the Brunson brothers – a group of trumpet-playing brothers who were upset about the fraudulent 2020 election just like you and me. The case got kicked up to federal court, where it was immediately dismissed. Funny how that has been the immediate response of every court that has been asked to look at any case related to the 2020 election, isn’t it?
First, a court tells the plaintiff they “lack standing” to sue and throw the case out. Next, the media lies and tells us that the court “found no evidence” of 2020 election fraud, while ignoring the fact that no court even looked at the case.
Anyway, the Brunsons appealed to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, which also wimped out by dismissing the case. They appealed to the Supreme Court next, and the court actually docketed the case. That happened back in October. The Solicitor General for the Department of Justice waived its right to issue a response to the case.
And now here’s a new piece of information: The Supreme Court will look at the case on January 6th. The court generally decides on docketed cases every Friday when it’s in session, so it could just be a coincidence. But they could have waited until the 13th or 20th of January, recognizing the obvious significance of the 6th of January. One of the options at the court’s disposal is that the Justices could vote to hear the full case. It only takes a vote of a minority of four Justices to make that happen.
Another thing we didn’t report on last time is the intelligence angle to this case. The Brunsons allege that about 385 Members of Congress violated their oath of office after the 2020 election. About 100 Representatives and Senators, led by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), were calling for the formation of an Election Commission, which is the historical standard Congress has followed whenever we’ve had a presidential election that was a hot mess of cheating.
In 1876, five US Senators, five US Representatives, and five US Supreme Court Justices were appointed to an Election Commission to investigate allegations of fraud. That’s the historical precedent that has been followed in the past in an election contested in multiple states where fraud was believed to have taken place. The Brunsons argue that the 385 or so Members of Congress who failed to follow that plan actually violated their oath of office.
But the Brunsons also allege that Congress violated its oath by delaying the intelligence report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). The ODNI was required to submit a report to Congress no later than December 18, 2020, on whether any foreign governments had interfered in the election.
That date came and went, and Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell never said a peep about it. They refused to allow anyone to look at the report until… January 7th. One day after the Election Justice Protest and after Joe Biden was declared the winner through a fraudulent count of the electoral votes. Does anyone remember this? I write about this election for a living, and I don’t remember this.
On January 7th, Congress finally learned from the ODNI that the 17 intelligence agencies were split over whether the election had suffered from foreign interference. Among the agencies that said there was foreign meddling, they all agreed that it was China. I can’t remember a single media outlet reporting on this at the time. Mostly because the entire media was still crying and peeing their pants about how they’d been traumatized by QAnon on January 6th. Failing to look at the ODNI report in which the intelligence agencies found that China interfered in the election was yet another way that most of Congress violated its oath of office.
What’s the Supreme Court going to do? We don’t know for sure. But some legal scholars say that the court could in fact grant relief to the Brunsons. If the court realizes just how angry the middle class is that our elections are now fake, they could do just that. (By the way, has anyone located the 80% of military ballots that just VANISHED in the elections in Wisconsin last month? Not that there’s anything weird, fake or fraudulent about that.) When the American middle class has finally had enough of this BS and starts rioting, they’re not going to be setting weak dumpster fires or breaking the windows at Starbucks. It’s going to be bad news for the people who have betrayed America.
While some lawyers think the court may just dismiss the case and let the lower court ruling stand, that doesn’t quite make sense. Why would they put it on the docket at all? They could have just let the lower court ruling stand. Instead, something is going to happen with this on January 6th. We’ll keep you posted!