These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content test

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More


Potential Major Court Victory for President Trump Unfolding Right Now

Corrupt prosecutor Jack Smith and the Deep State’s unrelenting attempts to prevent democracy from happening in 2024 ran into a brick wall this week. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal from three innocent January 6 defendants in a case that will have direct bearing on Jack Smith’s fake “insurrection” case in Washington, DC. Since the Supreme Court is likely to overturn the Biden regime’s creative interpretation of a financial crimes law, that case is now officially in limbo—which is exactly what Jack Smith and the Deep State wanted to avoid!

The law that federal prosecutors have twisted far beyond its actual intent is 18 U.S. Code § 1512(c)(2). That’s part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act that was passed in 2002 in response to the Enron boondoggle. It’s a law that basically imposes stiffer penalties on the CEO of a corporation if he starts shredding documents when he gets caught doing something wrong. What that has to do with waging an insurrection to try to overthrow the federal government is a mystery for the ages.

Federal prosecutors basically pulled this novel interpretation of 18 U.S. Code § 1512(c)(2) out of their butts to make it apply to January 6ers. More than 300 J6 defendants have been prosecuted under the Enron law, because prosecutors claim they “corruptly” “interrupted an official proceeding.”

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act uses those terms completely differently. In the actual law, the “official proceeding” is an investigation by the SEC or the IRS. Corruptly interrupting it means shredding documents or otherwise destroying evidence related to that investigation. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with interrupting a meeting of Congress. It’s like filing rape charges against someone after they’re arrested for jaywalking. They’re completely different statutes that have nothing to do with each other.

 

Three of the innocent January 6 peaceful protesters named Edward Lang, Garrett Miller and Joseph Fischer, opposed the government’s BS use of the Enron law to try to imprison them. The US District Court agreed and dismissed the Enron charge against the defendants. The US Court of Appeals reversed the District court decision, so now the defendants have appealed to the US Supreme Court.

And the Supreme Court has agreed to take up the case! This is hugely important because one of the charges that deranged Jack Smith filed against Trump in DC is corruptly interrupting an official proceeding under the Enron law. If the Supreme Court throws out the charge against Lang, Miller, and Fischer, it will automatically vacate the same charge against Donald Trump and against the other 300 innocent protesters who have been corruptly charged with a Wall Street financial crime because of January 6th.

Judge Tanya Chutkan has already been forced to suspend all the pre-trial deadlines in the DC case against Trump, pending the Supreme Court’s decision which won’t happen until sometime in January. Even if the Supreme Court rules that it’s perfectly fine for federal prosecutors to make crimes up out of thin air, it still throws a wrench into the carefully crafted fake prosecution of Donald Trump.

Chutkan had set a bunch of pre-trial deadlines for the DC case that are now in limbo. Prosecutors and the defense were supposed to file suppression motions by December 27, oppositions to suppression by January 9, replies to oppositions by January 22, Brady and Giglio obligations by February 12, exhibits by December 18, objections to exhibits by January 3, replies to objections by January 9, and on and on.

All of this stuff needed to happen within the next few weeks in order to start the trial as scheduled on March 4—the day before Super Tuesday. Because theatrics are a major part of this show trial against Donald Trump. Smith and the Deep State wanted to rush this case to trial so that they could meddle in the 2024 election, by trying to stop Trump’s momentum.

Smith can’t just shift to try to prosecute Trump in the Florida classified documents case—which is also flimsy and made up—because Judge Cannon has already suspended all the pre-trial deadlines in that case. Both federal cases against Trump are now in limbo and the Deep State’s timeline has been completely messed up.

One final note, and we don’t know what this means yet. But file this away for future reference. Both sides were supposed to give closing arguments in the fake Letitia James case in New York on Wednesday. Someone started a fire in a stairwell in the courthouse by setting a bunch of documents ablaze. Does anyone know where Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) was when that happened?


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More

16 thoughts on “Potential Major Court Victory for President Trump Unfolding Right Now”

  1. Jack Schitt Smith is a Threat To Democracy and must be sanctioned for his criminal misuse of the Laws of the United States of America.

    1. You are 100% right James. It should have happened a long time ago… That clown should also lose his license to practice law anywhere in the USA after attempting to make a mockery of USA court and Law. He’s right there with Schiff…

    2. JACK SMITH IS NOTHING BUT A TRAVESTY TO OUR REPUBLIC. GOING AFTER OUR PRESIDENT TRUMP IS JUST POLITICAL CHARADE, A FEATHER IN THEIR CAP, GOING AFTER A REAL PRESIDENT LIKE TRUMP. SHAME ON OUR SYSTEM LETTING CORRUPT JUDGES HAVING THIS CLOWN SHOW TO PLEASE BIDEN AND OBAMA.

    3. Some one please do it and loser pay all court costs, then we will see the corruption that is going on with the Democrat party, this needs to happen or they will continue to destroy our country.

  2. The democrats best friend Is confusion. It’s my opinion there are so many obscure laws on the books that in any given moment in time an American citizen is guilty of committing a crime. Suppose we wiped every law off the books along with every precedent and start over. Could no precedent be worse than misused precedent ?

  3. Re the “fake Letitia James case.” Trump should sue her personally. Not only did she campaign to :get him,” she was in court for several days, something AG’s never do.

    1. HOW CAN AMERICANS TRUST WHAT LETITIA JAMES IS DREAMING UP. SHE SHOULD BE ON TRIAL FOR ALL HER LIES.I HOPE SHE WILL NEVER GET ELECTED AGAIN. WHAT A PIECE OF CORRUPTION AND LIES SHE IS. HOW CAN ANYONE VOTE FOR THIS ABOMINATION???????? DID SHE GET VOTES FOR COLOR OR MERIT????

  4. Enron law, it is amazing how they twist things to suit their own needs. the incident in question was a supposed to happen situation. It served its purpose well. they won and ceriified the election and now have the country. maybe and probably forever.

  5. DITTO FOR ALL THE COMMENTS ABOVE.
    Please don’t forget the DEMONRAT MOTTO & CREED – PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY TO BLATANT LYING. THE FIRST IS ALWAYS USED AND THE LYING IS THEIR LAST EXCUSE…REGARDLESS, THEY’RE ALWAYS USED…

  6. The Democrats seem to be Actually Doing President Trump A favor-His Approval Numbers are Still going up While Democrats are getting Worse and Worse.

  7. I have posted this a number of times! I want at least one news organization to run the films they have of the so called security team that opened the doors to invite the crowds that were outside the White House. There would not have any of the mobs in the building if the doors were locked. There was one film that showed a so-called guard that did not have the proper key to open a glass door, so he broke the glass to let them in. All those films probably have been shredded. And I don’t think it was Trump supporters that started it, it was the Black Lives Matter, Proud Boys and others like it that started it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *