These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content test

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More


Which Was More Dangerous to Pregnant Women? COVID or the Vaccines?

Doctor giving injection to pregnant woman in hospital, closeup

Starting in April of 2021, government health agencies started a relentless campaign to get pregnant women and nursing moms to take the COVID shot. In the most hysterical terms possible, the CDC and the mainstream media in America said that if mothers didn’t get the jab, their babies were at risk—and so were the moms.

Was COVID really that dangerous to pregnant women and babies in the womb? Or were the COVID shots riskier than the disease for pregnant women? We now have the data to be able to answer that question.

 

2021 feels like ancient history to many people now, so they’ve forgotten about the hysterics of convincing pregnant women to get vaxed. Here’s a sampling of the headlines in English-language newspapers, media outlets and health publications from that time:

Scientific American: “COVID Poses Severe Risks During Pregnancy; Especially in Unvaccinated People”

ScienceNews: “Why being pregnant and unvaccinated against COVID-19 is a risky combo”

CBS News: “New study reveals stark COVID risks for unvaccinated pregnant women and their babies”

USA Today: “Pregnant with COVID: Large study shows being unvaccinated puts you and your baby in danger”

The New York Times: “Recent studies underscore the dangers of pregnancy complications for unvaccinated women with COVID”

UCHealth Today: “Urgent warning for pregnant women: Get your COVID-19 vaccines.”

Look at the seriousness of the language that they used to terrorize young women into getting the shots. Severe risks. Danger. Stark risks. Urgent.

All women instinctively want to protect the fragile life growing in their womb during pregnancy. Many won’t be in the presence of smokers and won’t even take a sip of red wine out of fear of harming their developing baby. Pregnancy is a scary process for many people, especially the first time they go through it, for these exact reasons.

But then when the entire government, healthcare establishment, media and Big Pharma scared them with all these stories, women willingly injected an experimental substance into their bodies. That shows us the power of the propaganda and psy-ops that were used against us. We can’t blame any woman who made the choice to get vaccinated, because the pressure was relentless and scary.

That brings us to our main question: Was it true?

We can now look at the data to see how pregnant women fared against COVID-19 in 2020. Well, we don’t have good data here in the USA, because our own government hates us. But we have some good data from the UK! 2020 is the perfect year to look at, since all pregnant women were unvaccinated then.

MBRRACE-UK did a comprehensive study of all the pregnant women who died in the UK between 2018 and 2020. An average of 76.3 women per year died during pregnancy in the UK in those years. Researchers found that there were nine (9) pregnant unvaccinated women in the whole of the UK who died either from or with COVID-19.

The Chinese coronavirus was rampant in the UK at that time. 94,194 Britons died from COVID in 2020, before there were any vaccines. But only nine of those deaths were pregnant women. Meanwhile, the UK and Wales had 613,936 live births in 2020.

For every pregnant woman that died from or with COVID-19, there were 68,000 women who carried their babies to term just fine.

As we reported last week, Pfizer gave a memo to the FDA and CDC Director Rochelle Walensky in April of 2021. Pfizer reported to the government agencies that it had conducted “safety” trials on pregnant women. The results of those documents showed that among 458 women who were given the COVID vaccines, 54% (248) of the pregnancies experienced severe adverse reactions to the vaccines.

One in five of the adverse reactions was spontaneous abortion. That means 11% of the babies died after the mothers were vaccinated. And the babies didn’t die from COVID. They died from things like fetal tachycardia and newborn pneumothorax. If you don’t want to have nightmares, don’t google newborn pneumothorax.

Three days after Rochelle Walensky received that report, proving that the COVID vaccines resulted in a kill rate of 11% for babies in the womb, she went on television and told the world that the COVID vaccines are safe and effective for pregnant women.

What do you think? Was COVID-19 more dangerous to pregnant women and their babies, when it resulted in 9 maternal deaths in the UK in 2020? Or were the shots with an 11% fetal kill rate more dangerous?


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More

6 thoughts on “Which Was More Dangerous to Pregnant Women? COVID or the Vaccines?”

  1. Pfizer killed these babies and should have to pay the price. If nothing is done, which probably won’t, it could happen again, and again. How many people died from the COVID. Nobody knows because the death stats were fake, but the deaths from the vaccines weren’t.

    1. The beauty of a vaccine is that they get a FREE PASS or a GET OUT OF JAIL FREE card bestowed to them by the government! They can’t be held liable for anything. That’s why the government ok’d the vax…..to kill as many as possible, or at the least, keep someone dependent on bug pharma for the rest of their miserable days. Anyone can sue for a medication, by vaxxes are immune to prosecution.

    2. Not true. Pfizer reported the study results and the adverse effects in the study turned out to be realistic. The onus is on the Govt Agency that then approved the vaccine for pregnant women.

  2. Recently announced that Walensky had, or was soon, resigning. Perhaps she grew a conscious, thinking about her part in this.
    The article covered numbers of fetal fatalities likely from vaccine and deaths from tachycardia and newborn pneumothorax, which is collapse of one or both lungs…and one collapsed lung often causes the second one to spontaneously collapse even in adults. The article did not cover the following of babies who had one or both of these complications and survived. It is likely, as with children, young adults, athletes, other adults, that the cardiac problems that have occurred from the vaccine continue as constant or sporadic risks. We’ve seen this often in all ages, but newborns were not followed for this. Good chance the cardiac problems continue. The immediate danger of spontaneous pneumothorax could also leave them with respiratory problems ongoing. Pneumothorax is rare, brought on by injury or disease. A vaccine causing this has been unheard of. If delivery doctors were able to act fast enough to save them at birth? Requires tools, tubes, machines and immediacy in treating a totally unforeseen complication, and causes of it unknown. Fluid around lungs pressuring a collapse or some strange phenomenon of viscosity, stickiness, keeping lungs from filling properly or at all, or some other rare or new action keeping lungs from functioning and filling. Hard to successfully take action against something so serious when unexpected and possibly unheard of. Not just holding them upside down and slapping buttocks to cause crying and filling of lungs. It when usual actions don’t work and staff must go on to extreme measures. Oxygen alone cannot expand a collapsed lung that is resistant to filling. We’re talking chest tubes, pressure or suction machines depending on cause, possibly opening the chest for immediate surgery and seeing what cause might be. No time to wait for tests as tgey try to deal with it on the fly and possibly dealing with new ground, new cause. I would not want to be the person dealing with that. Whatever was happening, and the immediacy of it, would not have a high success rate.

    We need data on these problems, especially for newborns, to know what became triggered to cause these problems and have ability to act tovtry and correct them as soon as born. Adults who have developed cardiac arrhythmia like tachycardia have usually shown resistance in stopping life endangering ones. We’ve seen that in other countries, since our country is not providing this info. A Crown Princess, soon to take the throne, collapsed while walking her dogs, surrounded by her security team who were also trained for emergency health situation responses. No cardiac history, but had cardiac arrest. A huge team of doctors worked on her for hours, unsuccessfully. CPR/defib was ineffective. Machines did not help. Nothing. Her cardiac situation was not responding to anything they tried. A baby likely would be similar. Again could be uncharted waters for all ages re treatment. And we need to find out causes and ways to successfully respond.

    Dara leads us to believe we should not be recommending the vaccine for pregnant females. We don’t even know if PRE-pregancy vaccination causes problems in a future developing fetus. Probably a good chance. A few months ago Pfizer announced they were about ready to roll out the process and doses for giving the vaccine to developing fetuses, through the womb! I hope they are studying the European data re newborns, because contact with delivery room air obviously didn’t cause these problems. It was set up in the womb like a time bomb. A mystery that needs to be solved yesterday.

  3. This is a no brainer! Definitely the vax!!!!! But hey, at least we’ll rid the world of the really stupid sheeple! Democrats should worry, because it a good portion of their voter base. It’s no wonder they’re flooding the border with ILLEGALS that are unvaxxed. THE REPLACEMENTS ARE HERE!!!!

  4. I wonder if the COVID tests were even accurate. I have never heard of a deadly desease, like they claimed COVID was, that you could test positive for it, not be sick, have no symptoms and still be effected with the desease. I know it if I even get a common cold. Did anybody ever see where anyone checked the tests to see if they were accurate? I never read where anyone did. The death stats were set nup to include every death, as a COVID death if you tested positive for the desease. No one knows how many actual deaths were caused by COVID alone. I someone shot you between the eyes and you tested positive it was counted as a COVID death.. How many people died because the doctors and hospitals were treating the people for the virus when something else was killing them? If the tests were not accurate, and I wonder if they were, the doctors and hospital were charging 3-4 times more if you tested positive. Was that why no one ever checked to see if the tests were accurate. Fauci just made up a name for you testing positive and not be sick or have any symthons of the desease. Politicians are so corrupt and crooked anymore, that I find it hard to believe anything they ssy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *